CIA Pervs Exposed – THIS Is What They’re Doing To Women?

A female Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) employee claims she was sexually assaulted within the agency and subsequently fired. This raises serious concerns about the handling of such allegations and the treatment of whistleblowers within the CIA.

The core of the incident, as reported by NBC News, is the allegation by a female employee of being sexually assaulted in a stairwell at the CIA. Following her accusation, she claimed the agency tried to keep her from filing a complaint about the incident.

The woman’s attorney, Kevin Carroll, has characterized her termination as “brazen retaliation,” suggesting that it was a clear response to her allegations and her status as a whistleblower to Congress, the inspector general, and police about workplace sexual violence at the CIA. Carroll’s assertion is critical, as it implies that the dismissal was not just an administrative action but a deliberate effort to silence and intimidate not only his client but also other potential whistleblowers. This claim is particularly significant in light of Carroll’s statement that at least two dozen more individuals have come forward with similar allegations of sexual assault within the agency.

In contrast, the CIA, through spokesperson Tammy Thorp, has denied these allegations of retaliation, asserting that the agency does not tolerate sexual assault or whistleblower retaliation. This denial is a strong stance from the agency, emphasizing its purported commitment to maintaining a safe and respectful workplace.

The situation seems to have escalated following the woman’s failure in the CIA’s clandestine officer training program. Carroll suggests that historically, employees who fail this program are allowed to apply for other positions within the agency. However, in this case, after applying for another job and not being selected, the woman was dismissed. The CIA attributes her failure in the training program to poor writing skills, a claim disputed by Carroll, who insists that she was an excellent writer.

The CIA’s stance, as stated by Thorp, emphasizes the agency’s consistent processes in training and the importance of fair and equal treatment of all officers. This statement suggests a rigid adherence to protocol and an implicit denial of any wrongdoing in the handling of the employee’s case.

The involvement of former CIA officers, who note that many who undergo clandestine training do not pass and are not guaranteed other positions within the agency, adds another layer to this complex situation. This perspective might suggest that the employee’s dismissal could be part of a normal administrative process rather than a retaliatory action.

Finally, the individual accused by the woman, Ashkan Bayatpour, was convicted of a state misdemeanor charge of assault and battery in Virginia, adding a legal dimension to the allegations and possibly lending credibility to the woman’s claims.

As the investigation continues, it remains crucial to consider all aspects and perspectives of this case, which touches on issues of workplace safety, the handling of sexual assault allegations, and the treatment of whistleblowers within the intelligence community.