New Report DESTROYS Democrats’ Top Narrative Lie

Research that has been a big drag on the housing industry and public services but has not really encouraged the economy is a criticism of the neo-liberal doctrine that has controlled both main political parties in Britain.

The so-called Conservative Party forced the nation to accept record levels of immigration, despite their pledge to the public to cut back on immigration after Brexit. However, a new report published by the Centre for Policy Studies, co-written by previous immigration chief Robert Jenrick, finds that this immigration has not increased economic growth per capita.

While proponents of globalism who support mass migration contend that it boosts GDP generally and tax receipts, providing governments with a talking point, the reality is different for each person.

While the UK saw the second-highest level of population growth last year, mostly due to mass migration, GDP per person fell by 0.8%, falling well short of the G7 average of 1.2%, according to data from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). This is in contrast to the UK’s GDP growing by 0.1% last year amid record amounts of immigration, The Telegraph reports.

“We have to ask why we are not seeing evidence of this in the GDP per capita numbers if large-scale migration of the type we have witnessed is actually so excellent for the economy,” the CPS research stated.

The think tank observed that despite the fact that former PM Boris Johnson’s immigration changes promised to concentrate on “highly selective” skills-focused immigration, the system has actually allowed large waves of foreign nationals to enter the country who are either unemployed or working in low-paying jobs due to the disastrously low entry barriers. According to the research, just 15% of the net two million people who entered the UK from non-EU countries during the previous five years did so primarily with the intention of finding employment.

The investigation also discovered that there has been an economic cost associated with the rush to import individuals from all over the world has resulted in an economic cost. For instance, immigrants from Spain typically make 40% more money than immigrants from Bangladesh or Pakistan. In contrast, migrants between the ages of 25 and 64 who came from North Africa, the Middle East, or Turkey were almost twice as likely to be “economically inactive” as those who were born in Britain.

Not only does mass migration not assist the typical British citizen economically, but it also comes at a cost in the form of increased demand, driving up housing market inflation and public service resources allocated to foreign nationals.

According to the CPS research, net migration accounted for 89% of the 1.34 million increase in the “housing gap,” a measure of the number of dwellings not constructed relative to population growth over the previous ten years.

The cost of rent has also climbed significantly as a result of mass migration; estimates indicate that in 2022, the flood of migrants boosted rent by an average of 10%. Cities have significantly impacted rent; in London, foreign-born individuals occupy nearly two-thirds (67%) of private rents.

In addition to artificially inflating housing costs, the anti-white mass migration agenda has severely strained the National Health Service. Between 2011 and 2021, the number of GP surgeries (offices) increased by just 4%, even though the UK population increased by 6.6%, primarily due to migration.

“It would be unacceptable if the government did not utilize the time before the election to rectify the terrible post-Brexit liberalizations that disregarded the stated demands of the British public for fewer immigrants,” former immigration minister Robert Jenrick said in response to the results.