The Wuhan Institute of Virology in China is the source of COVID-19, and researchers there have produced the virus, according to “smoking gun” proof, according to a renowned molecular scientist.
Molecular biologist Richard H. Ebright, Ph.D., is the laboratory director of the Waksman Institute of Microbiology and a member of the Rutgers University Board of Governors as a professor of chemistry and chemical biology. In addition to receiving the Walter J. Johnson Prize, the Harvard Junior Fellow was designated a Johnson & Johnson Discovery Research Fellow, the Infectious Diseases Society of America Fellow, the Searle Scholar Award, and the NIH MERIT Award.
Additionally, Ebright has participated in NIH special emphasis panels and the Molecular Biology Study Section.
In addition to over 175 publications, he holds over 40 granted and pending patents.
Ebright has also been a vocal opponent of the widely accepted theory on the COVID-19 virus’s genesis. According to Ebright, a document from 2018 provides “smoking gun” proof that researchers at a Chinese facility produced COVID-19.
Ebright highlights “Project DEFUSE,” a funding proposal for experiments submitted in March 2018.
American and Chinese virologists successfully petitioned the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, to provide a $14 million grant for the purpose of engineering SARS-CoV-1-related bat viruses in order to investigate their potential for human transmission.
As stated in the Wall Street Journal, “The plan for Project DEFUSE indicated that the viruses would become more contagious by introducing a furin cleavage site, which is a genetic feature. This technique may have resulted in the production of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 and has a unique furin cleavage site, depending on the starting viruses.”
Zhengli Shi, a Chinese bat researcher, Ralph Baric, a professor at the University of North Carolina, and EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak were engaged in the idea. Baric allegedly worked with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on “risky bat-virus research” in 2015.
The proposal details a partnership between Zhengli Shi, a senior scientist at WIV and the renowned “Bat Lady” of the Wuhan lab, and a team from Baric’s UNC lab. The proposal was written and sent to the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under the direction of Peter Daszak, whose EcoHealth Alliance would provide the researchers with the anticipated award money.”
DARPA eventually rejected the concept.
Nonetheless, it’s possible that Wuhan Lab of Virology researchers carried out Project DEFUSE with funding from the Chinese government.
“However, conjecture continues on whether the investigation could have continued with backing from the Chinese government,” stated The Washington Times. Moreover, Project DEFUSE proposed adding “human-specific cleavage sites” to the bat coronavirus spike proteins. These methods bear noteworthy similarities to those that some scientists believe may have been involved in creating the coronavirus that caused the worldwide health emergency.”
Former New York Times science editor Nicholas Wade stated in the Wall Street Journal that viruses created in accordance with the DEFUSE protocol may have been accessible by the time COVID-19 emerged, which could have happened any time between August and November 2019. This would explain both the origin and the otherwise puzzling timing of the epidemic.”
Associate professor of science and international security at King’s College London, Dr. Filippa Lentzos, has also encouraged the world to accept the possibility that scientific research may have been the source of the COVID epidemic.
Lentzos stated at a UN address, “We have to face the reality that the pandemic may have begun with some research-related incidence.”
Will we be able to ascertain that? I believe it’s really improbable that we will,” the woman said. In the future, we must perform better. More unclear occurrences are in store for us.”
“There will be an outbreak, and as an international society, we need to establish mechanisms in which we can study it because we won’t know if it’s natural, intentional, or accidental.” Lentzos issued a warning. “What matters to us is admitting that it may have been, so what should your answers be in this regard?”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention just released new COVID-19 guidelines that offer a sharp contrast to the agency’s earlier advice, as Blaze News reported on Saturday.
As of right now, the CDC advises treating COVID-19 the same way as the flu and advising anyone who tests positive for the virus to congregate outside in order to avoid becoming ill. Additionally, the virus no longer requires a minimum five-day quarantine from other individuals.
COVID was one of the biggest political fraud in the history of this country. The test were never checked to make sure they were accurate. I never heard of a deaease they claimed was so deadly, you could test positive, not be sick, have no symptoms or even know you have it, but could die from it . I know when I have a common cold. The death stats were set up to claim a COVID death if you committed suicide, was murdered, ran your car off a 50 foot clift, or whatever if you tested positive, it was counted as a COVID death even if the virus had nothing to do with your death.Nobody knows how many deaths was from the virus, if any. Doctors and hospitals made a fortune from the virus, charging 3-4 times as much if you tested positive, and nobody knows whether you even tested positive or not. Politicians loved it because they had more control over the people than they ever had. It will take years for the results of this fraud to go away and this country be back to what it used to be, if it ever does.
If the government has anything to do with anything it can’t be what it is supposed to be.
It’s sad that America had to find out, that the vaccine was the real killer of covid, and they’re still killing people, it completely destroys your amune system.
Well said James. Also, the “tests” were not actually tests. The RTPCR machines were never designed to be a diagnostic tool and should never be used to diagnose anything. Who said that??? Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR device and process. The PCR machine simply heat cycles a sample of bacteria or virus through a user determined number of cycles. This speeds up the growth of any biological material, just like an incubator, only faster. Kary was pissed when the same groups of evil people tried to use his machine to claim people had HIV in order to push an HIV vaccine campaign. Kary went around the world warning people that his machine is not to be used for diagnostics and that these groups were frauds. Kary conveniently died right before Covid was released into the world, although he was young and healthy. Videos of him have been blocked by social media & govt but they are still around if you know where to look. If you run enough cycles in a PCR, you can get it to spit out any results you want (either false positives or false negatives) to fit your current narrative.
the blood of people who died from the pzier vaccine is on biden and faucci
I don’t believe democrats in general were involved with creating (yet maybe erroneously funding) the COVID 19 virus. I do realize that the democrats too advantage of the hysteria to falsify huge numbers of mail in votes. Also I would be quite suspicious iof any “COVID recurrence” claims just before the next presidential election.
And what a shame that the vaccine that did not work is still being pushed on children today. Are the powers that be that desperate to control the population? The vaccine has already been shown to cause a decline in reproductive health of our child bearing population. Do we have to attack our infants and children now. God help us!