The radical left’s war on border enforcement has reached new lows, and Milwaukee Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan has just become the latest poster child for liberal lawlessness. Arrested and charged with obstruction for allegedly harboring an illegal immigrant—previously deported, no less—in her own jury room to evade ICE agents, Dugan’s actions highlight exactly why America demands strong borders, law and order, and accountability from those entrusted with enforcing our laws.
Now, in an ironic twist, Dugan has tapped former Bush-era Solicitor General Paul Clemente to lead her defense. Clemente, a conservative legal powerhouse known for his fierce advocacy of constitutional principles, has argued over 100 cases before the Supreme Court. He even appeared on President Trump’s shortlist for the high court, and is perhaps best remembered for challenging the disastrous Obama-era Affordable Care Act and successfully overturning the Chevron doctrine that empowered unelected bureaucrats.
On the surface, it’s puzzling that Clemente, a principled conservative, would defend a judge accused of aiding illegal immigration—a betrayal of the rule of law conservatives hold dear. But as any constitutionalist worth his salt knows, the right to a robust legal defense is fundamental, even when defending someone whose views we find repugnant. Clemente’s involvement underscores the critical importance of due process, something liberals often disregard when it suits their agenda.
Make no mistake: Dugan’s alleged actions are reprehensible and represent exactly the kind of liberal judicial activism President Trump has fought vigorously against. Concealing Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, a Mexican national charged with multiple counts of battery, from federal agents is not just obstruction—it’s an affront to every American citizen who believes in the sanctity of our nation’s borders and the legitimacy of our immigration laws.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court swiftly stepped in, temporarily suspending Dugan from her official duties. Such decisive action sends a clear message: judges are not above the law, and conservative Americans will not tolerate activist judges who place political ideology over public safety. It’s a message President Trump has championed from day one, prioritizing America First principles of border security and law enforcement.
Dugan’s defense team, led by Clemente and former U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic, faces an uphill battle. The facts detailed in the criminal complaint are damning. After Flores-Ruiz’s court appearance, Dugan allegedly ushered him through a restricted exit, circumventing ICE agents who were lawfully present to detain him. This blatant disregard for federal law enforcement is not just ethically troubling—it’s legally indefensible.
Clemente’s entry into this case has certainly raised eyebrows, given his conservative bona fides. However, his history as a staunch defender of constitutional rights means he’ll likely approach this case as a matter of legal principle rather than political alignment. Clemente’s defense of Dugan will undoubtedly focus on procedural arguments, challenging the specifics of the charges rather than endorsing her alleged actions.
Still, this case underscores why conservative vigilance is necessary in our judiciary. For too long, liberal judges have ignored or subverted immigration law, creating sanctuary cities and undermining the safety of American communities. President Trump’s commitment to appointing principled conservative judges has never been more vital. As he stated in a recent rally, “We must have judges who respect our laws, our borders, and the safety and security of American citizens above all else.”
The Dugan case serves as a stark reminder of what’s at stake when activist judges bend laws to fit their political narrative. It’s a reminder why President Trump’s America First agenda, including his relentless focus on border security and judicial integrity, resonates with millions of everyday Americans. Conservatives will be watching this case closely, ensuring that justice is served and that liberal judicial activism is finally held accountable.