Shocking Way Illegals Are Gaming the System Exposed

How deep does the rabbit hole go when it comes to immigration and asylum in the United States? The recent DOGE team, along with Elon Musk and Antonio Gracias, has unveiled the proverbial tip of the iceberg, exposing a catastrophic failure of our asylum system under the Biden administration. It’s time we recognize the scale and urgency of this crisis and demand action that aligns with the core American values of justice, sovereignty, and security.

First, let’s get to the heart of the problem. Under our current system, asylum seekers can receive work authorization just five months after filing for asylum, not when their claims are validated. That’s a glaring issue because it incentivizes fraudulent asylum applications as a backdoor to legal work authorization. No fee and practically no oversight—it’s an open invitation for abuse. The system is essentially handing out Social Security numbers, opening the gates to driver’s licenses, and clearing the path for potential voter fraud. It’s this unchecked and unregulated corridor that leads us to the brink of a national security nightmare.

Let’s talk numbers. Thanks to this rampant issue, the number of Social Security numbers issued to non-citizens has surged—270,000 in 2021 up to an astonishing 2.1 million by 2024. And it’s not just numbers. It’s the ripple effects that come with them. Millions of these applicants are tapping into Medicaid, with some even registered to vote and, horror of horrors, actually voting. Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can’t keep pace, opting instead for an administrative sleight of hand by extending work authorizations from six to eighteen months without checks.

It’s a fundamental breach of accountability, one where the administration’s solution to bureaucracy-induced backlog is to allow more unrestricted access to U.S. benefits and enterprise for those who may not have earned it. This operational negligence isn’t just a bureaucratic hiccup—it’s a hijacking of our legal systems and a betrayal of the American people’s trust.

Congress must reclaim its authority and restore the immigration asylum system to its original intent: protecting genuine refugees from persecution. The legislative body needs to act decisively to tighten immigration benefits criteria, ensuring work authorizations are only granted when asylum claims are substantiated. They should also implement stringent anti-fraud measures to deter and penalize those exploiting the system—a measure that will also accelerate processing times for legitimate claims.

Beyond Congress, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) must take immediate steps to scrutinize historical applications within DHS and the DOJ to excise fraud from these systems. It’s a more than manageable task but one requiring commitment and rigorous oversight. DOGE should also institute a coordinated notification system that would alert relevant agencies and employers if an asylum claim or work authorization is denied, enforcing compliance and minimizing misuse of our resources.

What hangs in the balance is not just the integrity of our borders but the sovereignty of our nation. American taxpayers and citizens deserve an immigration system that prioritizes their security and prosperity, not one that leaves its backdoor ajar for exploitation. The alarm has been sounded; it’s time for Congress and watchdogs like DOGE to decide whether they will let America remain a beacon of genuine refuge or if they will relegate it to a haven of unchecked exploitation.

American exceptionalism stems not from an open-door policymaking that favors system abusers but from vigilant, responsible governance that secures our borders while honoring our legacy as a land of opportunity. The answer lies in decisive action today, securing our laws for a safer and genuinely welcoming tomorrow.

Trump’s War On DEI Goes Global- Wokesters Beware

Let’s get one thing straight, folks: When it comes to American leadership, we do not buckle under the pressures of fads or political correctness. President Donald Trump’s latest executive order, targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs within federal contracts, is a beacon of common sense piercing through a fog of bureaucratic nonsense. Predictably, this move has sent ripples across the globe, with Portuguese companies now reconsidering their standing contracts with the U.S. government. But let’s cut to the chase—this isn’t just a contract negotiation tactic; this is about protecting American values.

DEI programs have been spun as noble initiatives meant to uplift and equalize. But the real impact? More division, more bureaucracy, and more of your tax dollars funneled not into innovation or national security, but into enforcing ideological conformity. What President Trump has done is straightforward—he’s placed a conservative stake in the sand, saying we’re not going to fund agendas that run counter to American interests. And frankly, it’s about time someone had the courage to do it.

Consider the strategic implications of these DEI policies. By prioritizing ideology over merit, these programs weaken our global competitiveness. America once led the world with its unyielding belief in the power of the individual, in the greatness found when each person is judged not by the group they belong to, but by their talent and effort. It is this principle of meritocracy that built robust industries and propelled us to the forefront of technological and economic advancements. President Trump understands that and is willing to stand up for it in a world increasingly drifting toward collectivism.

Moreover, this executive action is a rallying cry for American self-reliance. For too long, we’ve outsourced our manufacturing, outsourced our technology, and now it seems, outsourced our values. Yet, when Brazilian and Chinese corporations express concern, it’s not about the well-being of American citizens; it’s about the dollars they might lose. That’s the crux of the issue—foreign entities finding themselves grappling with a simple truth that should resonate across this nation: We will not compromise our principles for profit.

[“wce_code id=4”]

The reaction from Porto to Lisbon suggests a deep misunderstanding of our foundation. While media outlets and critics from political shades may wring their hands, this represents a paradigm shift back to common-sense governance. This issue impacts real Americans—the engineers whose innovation has been stifled by unnecessary red tape, the workers overlooked in favor of checkbox diversity hires, the citizens who watch their country backpedal on foundational beliefs.

Let’s be unequivocal: diversity is not inherently a flaw. America’s quintessential strength lies in its blend of ideas, cultures, and perspectives. But the key is balance. It’s ensuring that this diversity doesn’t become a tool for division, but rather, an opportunity to thrive collectively, grounded in shared values of liberty and justice.

Skeptics will argue that this move might alienate allies or fracture international economic relations. However, ask yourself what’s more critical: maintaining shallow alliances built on our submission, or fostering genuine partnerships grounded in mutual respect and real commonality? Foreign criticism is not the yardstick by which we measure our success. It’s the thriving American spirit, the protected individual freedoms, and the advancement of our country that decide our course.

What President Trump is saying, unapologetically, is that the United States will not partake in global practices that sacrifice its soul for appeasement. We lead by setting the bar high, firmly grounded in our exceptionalism, without yielding to fleeting trends. We remain steadfast, as always, on the path envisaged by our founders—bold, strong, and undaunted. As real Americans, it’s our duty to support a government that has the audacity to do what’s right.

Shocking Prediction: How Likely Is Trump 3rd Term?

Imagine an America led by a visionary leader, someone who unapologetically stands for patriotism and the revival of American greatness. Now imagine those dreams hitting a wall simply because he can’t win a third term as President. This is the debate we face today, brought into focus by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland’s comment labeling a potential third term for Donald Trump—a man who reshaped our country—for better or worse, as ‘a heavy lift.’ And isn’t it ironic that such remarks come at a time when America yearns for the kind of strong leadership that rolls up its sleeves and gets things done?

Let’s cut to the chase. What Garland’s statement truly highlights isn’t the impossibility of a third Trump term, but rather an ideological battle between status quo bureaucrats and everyday Americans who feel unheard. This is more than about one man and one office; this is about a nation’s direction. It’s a clash of values: innovation versus stagnation; rejuvenated exceptionalism versus complacency.

At the heart of it, the real issue is about preserving the gains we’ve fought for as a nation. During Trump’s administration, we witnessed deregulation that fostered economic growth, moves towards energy independence, and a Supreme Court realigned to better reflect constitutional principles. Perhaps what rattles institutions like the DOJ is the thought of a maverick leader disrupting their carefully constructed order for an unprecedented third time.

The narrative that a third Trump term would be “a heavy lift” rests on constitutional and political assumptions. Yes, the 22nd Amendment limits presidents to two terms. However, what’s really at stake here is not an academic argument but the deeper ideological divide: Should America be led by the people or by an elite class of bureaucrats?

And let’s not forget, when Garland and others voice doubts about another Trump administration, what’s really being dismissed are the Americans who rallied in long lines in 2016 and again in 2020, millions who felt disillusioned by a political class more invested in globalism than in them. Theirs is the voice that shook the pillars of both major parties, and it is their aspirations for a country that puts “America First” that would truly find “a heavy lift” from those accustomed to maintaining the status quo.

This debate over leadership isn’t just theoretical. It impacts real Americans, from the blue-collar worker in Ohio who found new job opportunities thanks to Trump’s economic policies to the farmer in the Midwest who saw trade deals finally benefit them instead of being hoodwinked by unfavorable foreign agreements. A President Trump, term three or not, symbolizes policies shaped by and for these Americans—not for lobbyists or career politicians.

Critics may scoff, but the question remains: Is it time to revive the dynamism of a leadership style that raised uncomfortable but necessary questions about our foreign alliances, our trade policies, and our very governmental structure? A leadership style that prioritized direct communication with the public even if it ruffled some feathers?

While some may argue that a third term presidency isn’t feasible, others ponder why innovation stops at politics. Why can’t we imagine a future where a leader’s potential isn’t capped by archaic restrictions but is instead driven by voters’ needs? True progress doesn’t come with blind adherence to norms but by questioning and evolving them. Yet, it requires leaders unafraid to defy the politically correct in favor of national interest.

Our Constitution wasn’t designed to be a straightjacket; it was set up to adapt, embodying the spirit of American ingenuity and boldness. Whether Trump realizes his third-term aspiration or not, let this discourse trigger a renewed hunger for leaders willing to prioritize America over ideologies, reminding us that we, the people, hold the ultimate power. We shouldn’t balk at mountains labeled as “heavy lifts”; that’s exactly what determined Americans have always conquered.

Here lies the crux: Are we going to let the mere notion of difficulty diminish our conviction? Or shall we continue to seek leaders emboldened by audacity, backed by the undeniable resolve of the American dream? That’s not just a Republican imperative; that’s an American call to action.

This is The Most Deadly AR-15 Modification Yet

Earlier this year, you might remember the slew of memes that followed USA Today’s decision to suggest that chainsaw bayonets were a common modification to the AR-15. The sheer hyperbole of the infographic was simply too much for memers to pass up, and they’ve thankfully continued this hilarious tradition.

This time, we’re taking a jab at the strange decision by some parts of California to make straws illegal — because of the environment, or something…

Excellent decision, liberals. Don’t worry about the hordes of foreign nationals entering your borders with no vetting whatsoever. What’s really going to save the world is making it more difficult for everyone to enjoy a beverage.

For the sake of the midterms, let’s hope the left keeps coming up with ideas like this. Apart from this, all they’ve been telling us about their platform is that they are not, in fact, Donald Trump — which is supposed to be some sort of positive.

~ Facts Not Memes

Remember When ALL of These People Met with Putin?

When President Donald Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier in July, the mainstream media went into full meltdown mode.

As Trump stood by his Kremlin counterpart indicating that he wanted to work toward more friendly relations between their two countries, all the likes of CNN, MSNBC, the Washington Post, and others could talk about is how the White House is under the thumb of a former KGB agent.

Apparently, the talking heads have a very short memory — every single head of state who has served during Putin’s reign has had to talk to the Russian leader at some point or another. During her time as Barack Obama’s Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton had to do the same. In short, members of the executive branch have to engage in diplomacy from time to time — sometimes with leaders whose policies are abhorrent by western standards.

All of this is part of the left-wing witch hunt, and it’s only going to continue as Special Counsel Robert Mueller drags his feet on his baseless investigation into the alleged Trump-Russia connection.

~ Facts Not Memes

Capitalism is So Great That Even Socialists Love It

New York congressional candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez really is the gift that keeps on giving.

From her suggestion that the unemployment rate is so low because “everyone has two jobs” to her incessant need to virtue signal at every opportunity, the left-wing darling has become a walking, talking parody of the so-called democratic socialist movement in the United States.

Ocasio-Cortez loves to slam capitalism and the allegedly oppressive hierarchies that it creates, but apparently she is a full-on practitioner — as her campaign demonstrates.

Shouldn’t these items be free of charge? Or rather, shouldn’t they just be arbitrarily mailed out to random people who may not have them? It’s almost like she realizes that she needs to make money or something…

Yes, even the former bartender understands that she needed to pay someone to make these products, and she has to charge people who want to buy them in order to stay solvent. That’s not just capitalism — it’s a basic economic reality.

But, go ahead and keep fighting the man, Alexandria. We all know how this ends…because it’s happened before.

~ Facts Not Memes